Tony and Lynne were asked to prove that My Advertising Pays was a legitimate UK business, given that MAP have publicly stated that they employ a number of people in the UK and were therefore subject to UK Employment/Tax/VAT laws.
Not one of the questions asked were answered.
Tony and Lynne have instead quoted the Terms and Conditions that all members signed up to when joining My Advertising Pays and claim they are just ordinary members as well.
'WE (My Advertising Pays) WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY LOSS OF REVENUE, PROFITS, OR DATA, ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE AFFILIATE PROGRAM, EVEN IF WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, FURTHER, OUR AGGREGATE LIABILITY ARISING WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT AND THE AFFILIATE PROGRAM WILL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL COMMISSIONS PAID OR PAYABLE TO YOU UNDER THIS AGREEMENT DURING THE 3 MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO SUCH LIABILITY.'
The Small Claims Court in the UK is specifically for ordinary members of the public to state their case in front of a Judge, without the need for a Solicitor or legal jargon.
The Claimant/Defendant need only present all the evidence they have (videos, social media posts etc) to the Judge for a (quick) decision to be made and a CCJ to be issued.
The Solicitors letter states that the Claimant has no prospect of success in this case.
We beg to differ.
Watch this space...
https://taratalkstoday.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/tony-booth-lynne-booth-and-michael.html
https://taratalkstoday.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/tony-booth-lynne-booth-and-michael.html
I hope whoever is suing MAP wins their case, it will encourage others to sue them as well
ReplyDelete